History
  • No items yet
midpage
Jackson v. State
685 So. 2d 7
Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
1996
Check Treatment
PER CURIAM.

We affirm Appellant’s conviction and sentence following an order that he violated probation by committing the substantive offense of loitering and prowling. However, we remand for modification of the violation of probation order by striking, as a ground for violation, Appellant’s failure to attend Narcotics Anonymous or Alcoholics Anonymous meetings.

As to his failure to attend meetings, the only adverse evidence concerned his not submitting a written document required by the probation officer that would confirm his attendance. However, the evidence does not reflect that his failing to submit the written document prior to his arrest on the substantive offense was willful. E.g., Frazier v. State, 587 So.2d 660 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991). The record does support the finding that Appellant violated his probation by committing the substantive offense.

GUNTHER, C.J., and STONE and SHAHOOD, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Jackson v. State
Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Date Published: Oct 16, 1996
Citation: 685 So. 2d 7
Docket Number: No. 95-3100
Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.