midpage

Jackson v. StateJackson v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida
May 19, 1992
No. 91-1061
Versions:598 So. 2d 303
1992 WL 104644
1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 5951
SCHWARTZ, Chief Judge.

We reverse Jackson’s convictions because, over objection, an investigating police officer was permitted to recount that defendant had “an arrest record and was recently released from prison.” See McGuire v. State, 584 So.2d 89 (Fla. 5th DCA 1991); McCall v. State, 463 So.2d 425 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985); Houston v. State, 360 So.2d 468 (Fla.3d DCA 1978); Perkins v. State, 349 So.2d 776 (Fla. 2d DCA 1977). The other evidence of guilt consisted entirely of non-conclusive eyewitness identification so we cannot say that the error was harmless, State v. DiGuilio, 491 So.2d 1129 (Fla.1986), and a new trial is therefore required.

Reversed.

Case Details

Case Name: Jackson v. State
Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Date Published: May 19, 1992
Citations: 598 So. 2d 303; 1992 WL 104644; 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 5951; No. 91-1061
Docket Number: No. 91-1061
Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
Log In