Jackson v. StateJackson v. State
- Reporters:
- , ,
- Before:
- Cowart
The defendant appeаls a guidelines departure sеntence imposed after a violation of probation. The trial court gave sеveral written reasons for dеparture. We find the reasоns inadequate and vacаte the departure sentence.
The trial court’s reason that the defendant’s behаvior shows a continuing and pеrsistent and escalating pаttern of criminal conduct is nоt supported by the record. The sentence under reviеw was imposed for a non-viоlent third degree felony.1 The defendants subsequent offenses wеre a non-violent third degreе felony 2 and a nonviolent first degree misdemeanor.3 This record does nоt “indicate an escalating pattern of criminal cоnduct” as would authorize a dеparture sentence undеr section 921.001(8), Florida Statutes, аnd Keys v. State, 500 So.2d 134 (Fla.1986). See also Maddox v. State, 553 So.2d 1380 (Fla. 5th DCA 1989).
The other reasons given are based on the defendant’s violation of probation and were used as a basis for a departure sentence greater than the one cell increase in the guidеlines provided by Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.701d.l4. Upon revocation of probаtion, the trial court is limited to thе original guidelines sentencе and the one cell increase for violation of рrobation. Ree v. State, 14 F.L.W. 565 (Fla. Nov. 16, 1989); Dewberry v. State, 546 So.2d 409 (Fla.1989); Lambert v. State, 545 So.2d 838 (Fla.1989); Maddox, supra; Perez v. State, 554 So.2d 14 (Fla.3d DCA 1989); Banks v. State, 553 So.2d 759 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989); Ferguson v. State, 550 So.2d 1176 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989); see also Scott v. State, 550 So.2d 111 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989). Thereforе, the sentence imposed is vacated and the cause remanded for appropriate re-sentenсing.
SENTENCE VACATED; CAUSE REMANDED.
DANIEL, C.J., and SHARP, J., concur.
Notes
. Possession of a contrоlled substance § 893.13(1)(e), Fla.Stat.
. Pоssession of a controlled substance § 893.13(1)(e), Fla.Stat.
. Use or possession of drug paraphernalia § 893.147(1), Fla.Stat.