328 So. 2d 457
Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
1976
PER CURIAM.

The evidence was sufficient to sustain appellant’s conviction of uttering a forgery. As to Point II, the trial court did not err in refusing to instruct the jury on attempting uttering of a forgery. See, King v. State, 317 So.2d 852 (Fla.App. 1st, 1975).

At P IKMJiJL».

CROSS, OWEN and MAGER, JJ., concur.