Jackson v. State, 328 So. 2d 457

PER CURIAM.

The evidence was sufficient to sustain appellant’s conviction of uttering a forgery. As to Point II, the trial court did not err in refusing to instruct the jury on attempting uttering of a forgery. See, King v. State, 317 So.2d 852 (Fla.App. 1st, 1975).

At P IKMJiJL».

CROSS, OWEN and MAGER, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Jackson v. State

Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida

Date Published: Mar 12, 1976

Citations: 328 So. 2d 457; 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 14833; No. 75-560

Docket Number: No. 75-560

Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.