History
  • No items yet
midpage
Jackson v. State
111 S.E. 750
Ga. Ct. App.
1922
Check Treatment
Bloodworth, J.

There is no merit in any of the grounds of the amendment to the motion for a new trial. There is ample evidence to support the verdict, which has the approval of the trial judge, and this court will not interfere. -Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, C. J., and Luke, J., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Jackson v. State
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Georgia
Date Published: Apr 11, 1922
Citation: 111 S.E. 750
Docket Number: 13214
Court Abbreviation: Ga. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.