midpage

Jackson v. StateJackson v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Apr 11, 1922
13214
Reporters:
,
Before:
Bloodworth
Bloodworth, J.

There is no merit in any of the grounds of the amendment to the motion for a new trial. There is ample evidence to support the verdict, which has the approval of the trial judge, and this court will not interfere. -Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, C. J., and Luke, J., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Jackson v. State
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Georgia
Date Published: Apr 11, 1922
Citations: 28 Ga. App. 442; 111 S.E. 750; 13214
Docket Number: 13214
Court Abbreviation: Ga. Ct. App.
Log In