midpage

Jackson v. StateJackson v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida
Feb 19, 1975
74-1547
Versions:308 So. 2d 600

PER CURIAM.

It appearing that the appellant is unable to secure a transcript of the trial testimony from the official court reporter, and that counsel for the respective parties have indicated that after diligent effort they are unable to reconstruct the record, which fact is attested to by the trial judge, it is therefore

Ordered and adjudged that the final judgment of conviction and sentence here under review be and the same is hereby set aside, and the appellant is remanded to the trial court for the purposes of being accorded a new trial. See: Simmons v. State, Fla.App. 1967, 200 So.2d 619; Yancey v. State, Fla.App. 1972, 267 So.2d 836; Fernandez v. State, Fla.App. 1974, 292 So.2d 410; Dismukes v. State, Fla.App. 1974, 299 So.2d 133.

Case Details

Case Name: Jackson v. State
Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Date Published: Feb 19, 1975
Citations: 308 So. 2d 600; 74-1547
Docket Number: 74-1547
Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
Log In