Fanoris Jermaine Jackson brings this appeal from his conviction for malice murder, burglary, three counts of false imprisonment, and possession of a firearm by a first offender probationer.
1
The evidence presented at
1. The evidence adduced at trial and set out above was sufficient to authorize a rational trier of fact to find Jackson guilty beyond a reasonable doubt of the crimes of which he was tried and convicted.
Jackson v. Virginia,
2. Jackson has attempted to raise on appeal ineffective assistance of counsel and has moved to remand this case to the trial court for an evidentiary hearing on that subject. However, because Jackson’s appellate counsel was appointed prior to the filing of the notice of appeal, Jackson is procedurally barred from raising for the first time on appeal the issue of ineffectiveness of counsel.
Glover v. State,
3. Relying on Uniform Superior Court Rule 33.6 (B), 2 Jackson complains that the trial court punished him for exercising his right to a jury trial by imposing consecutive sentences for all offenses other than the one to which he pleaded guilty. That argument is refuted by a careful reading of the transcript, where it may readily be seen that the trial court’s concern was Jackson’s lack of remorse. We find no merit in Jackson’s argument that the trial court imposed consecutive sentences in order to punish Jackson’s exercise of his right to a jury trial.
Judgment affirmed.
Notes
The crimes were committed on February 24,1997, and Jackson was indicted on February 11, 1998 for malice murder, felony murder (aggravated assault), aggravated assault, burglary, three counts of false imprisonment, and possession of a firearm by a first offender probationer. A trial conducted June 1-4, 1998, resulted in a verdict of guilty on all counts except the firearm possession count, to which Jackson entered a guilty plea after the verdict on the other counts. The trial court sentenced Jackson to life imprisonment for malice murder (the felony murder count was vacated by operation of law, and the trial court merged the aggravated assault conviction into the murder count), and consecutive sentences of twenty years for burglary, ten years each for two false imprisonment counts, éve years for the other false imprisonment count, and five years for the firearm possession count. On July 2,1998, a notice of appeal was filed for Jackson by counsel appointed post-conviction; the appeal was docketed in this Court on July 20, 1998, and the case was submitted for decision on the briefs.
“The judge should not impose upon a defendant any sentence in excess of that which would, be justified by any of the rehabilitative, protective, deterrent or other purposes of the criminal law merely because the defendant has chosen to require the prosecution to prove his guilt at trial rather than to enter a plea of guilty or nolo contendere.” USCR 33.6 (B).
