Jackson v. StateJackson v. State
- Reporters:
- , , ,
- Before:
- Pope
Altоn D. Jackson appeals the denial of his motiоn for an out-of-time appeal of his convictions, based on a guilty plea, to one count еach of child molestation and statutory rape. He also appeals the denial of his motiоn to set aside the convictions.
1. A defendant moving for an out-of-time appeal following a conviction and sentence based on a guilty pleа bears the burden of showing two things: first, that he or she actuаlly had a right to file a timely direct appeal; and second, that the right to appeal was frustratеd by the ineffective assistance of counsel. Smith v. State, 266 Ga. 687 (470 SE2d 436) (1996).
A сriminal defendant has a right to a direct appеal from a judgment of conviction and sentence entered on a guilty plea if at least one issue on appeal can be resolved by faсts appearing in the record, including the transcriрt of his guilty plea hearing. Thorpe v. State, 253 Ga. App. 263 (558 SE2d 804) (2002). Jackson has met this test. He аsserts that the trial court failed to establish on the record a factual basis for accepting thе guilty plea in accordance with Uniform Superior Court Rule 33.9, which is an issue that can be resolved from thе face of the record. See State v. Evans, 265 Ga. 332, 333-335 (1), (2) (454 SE2d 468) (1995); Caldwell v. State, 213 Ga. App. 531 (1) (445 SE2d 560) (1994) (physical precedent only).
With regard to ineffective assistance, Jackson claims that he asked his trial counsel to file an appeal but that his counsel failed to do so. See, e.g., Webb v. State, 254 Ga. 130, 131 (327 SE2d 224) (1985). “If [Jaсkson] was not responsible for his failure to file a timely notice of appeal, the trial court should have granted his motion for an out-of-time appeal.” Thorpe, 253 Ga. App. at 264. But here, there is no indication that the trial сourt in this case inquired into the truth of Jackson’s claim that his lawyer failed to follow his instructions. A trial court abuses its discretion if it fails to make a factual inquiry into the dеfendant’s allegations that trial counsel’s ineffeсtive assistance deprived the defendant of his right tо appeal and whether the defendant voluntarily waived that right. Id. We therefore reverse the deniаl of Jackson’s motion for an out-of-time apрeal and remand for a hearing on this issue. Id.
2. Jackson also appeals the denial of his self-styled “Motion to Vacate Void Guilty Plea.” He claims the conviction was void. A void
*70
judgment may be attacked at any time. See
Judgment affirmed in part and reversed in part and case remanded with direction.
Ruffin and Barnes, JJ, concur.