Jackson v. StateJackson v. State
James Arnell Jackson was convicted of selling cocaine and received a mandatory life sentence. 1 On appeal, he enumerates three errors, contesting the admission of similar transaction evidence, *208 alleging ineffective assistance of counsel, and challenging the sufficiency of the evidence.
The evidence, viewed in the light most favorable to the verdict, revealed that Jackson sold a $20 piece of crack cocaine to an undercover agent.
Rigenstrup v. State,
1. Jackson waived his argument that the similar transaction evidence was offered for an improper purpose and was too remote in time. In' cases where a similar transaction hearing is held pursuant to Uniform Superior Court Rule 31.3 (B), the failure to object to the introduction of the similar transaction evidence at trial waives the issue.
Buckner v. State,
2. Jackson also waived his claim that his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to assert a chain of custody objection to the admission of the cocaine he sold to the agent. An ineffectiveness claim cannot be asserted in an out-of-time appeal without first pursuing the issue in a motion for'new trial in which the issue is raised and resolved by means of an evidentiary hearing.
Peavy v. State,
3. Viewed in a light most favorable to the verdict, a rational trier of fact cpuld find all the essential elements of the crime of spiling cocaine, fa controlled substance.
2
Judgment affirmed-
Notes
We dismissed Jackson’s initial appeal for failure to file a brief and enumeration of errors. The trial court subsequently granted his motion for out-of-time appeal.
We observe with disappointment that the State inexplicably neglected to address two of the three enumerations of error in violation of Court of Appeals Rule 27 (b) (2).