midpage

Jackson v. SingletaryJackson v. Singletary

District Court of Appeal of Florida
Jun 11, 1997
No. 96-2286
Versions:695 So. 2d 494
22 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 1436
1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 6253
PER CURIAM.

Upon our conclusion that, in the circumstances of his ease, the appellant Jackson became entitled to administrative gain time under section 944.276, Florida Statutes (1987)(repealed by eh. 88-122, § 6, at 527, 537, Laws of Fla.) and provisional credits under section 944.277, Florida Statutes (Supp.1988)(repealed by ch. 93-406, § 32, at 2911, 2966, Laws of Fla.), the order below denying mandamus is reversed1 because he was unlawfully deprived of those benefits by the enactment of section 944.278, Florida Statutes (1993). Lynce v. Mathis, — U.S. -, 117 S.Ct. 891, 137 L.Ed.2d 63 (1997); see also Orosz v. Singletary, 693 So.2d 538 (Fla.1997). The cause is remanded for determination of the precise amount of time to which he is entitled.

Notes

. We reject the appellee’s claim that the appeal is untimely.

Case Details

Case Name: Jackson v. Singletary
Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Date Published: Jun 11, 1997
Citations: 695 So. 2d 494; 22 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 1436; 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 6253; No. 96-2286
Docket Number: No. 96-2286
Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
Log In