Jackson v. Rose McCarron
77 Kan. 776
Kan.1908Check TreatmentTwo questions are presented:
(1) Is the tax deed void because not attested by the-official seal of the county? The written certificate of the county clerk recites: “I . . . have hereunto subscribed my name and affixed the official seal of said county,” and a seal is affixed with this device:
“COUNTY CLERK SEAL
LOGAN COUNTY, KANSAS.”
And it is also shown that this seal had been used by the county clerk (with the exception of only one instance) and by his predecessors in office for years to attest all of his and their official acts. The evidence, however, showed that the county had another seal,, which bore the device:
“BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS SEAL
LOGAN COUNTY, KANSAS.”
The latter seal the evidence tended to show had been used but once by the county clerks to attest an official act, and then by special request, after the commencement of this action. We answer the question in the negative, on the authority of Clarke v. Tilden, 72 Kan. 574, 84 Pac. 139.
(2) Is the tax deed valid? It has been of record less than five years, and the recital therein as to the sale for taxes is as follows:
“And whereas, at the place aforesaid, said property could not be sold for the amount of taxes and charges thereon, and was, therefore bid off by the county treasurer of said county for the sum of eleven dollars and twenty cents, the whole amount of taxes and charges then due thereon.”
It will be observed that the recital does not show for-
The judgment is affirmed.