Jackson v. O'Hara

183 Pa. 233 | Pa. | 1897

Per Curiam,

This appeal is from the judgment entered by the court below against the defendant for want of a sufficient affidavit of defense. For reasons given by the court we think there was no error in “holding that the facts set forth in the defendants’ affidavit of defense ” do not constitute a defense to the plaintiff’s cause of action; and hence there was no' error in making the rule for judgment absolute.

The judgment is affirmed for reasons given in the opinion of .the court below.