Jackson v. GeigerJackson v. Geiger
Jan 31, 1927
Versions:135 A. 917103 N.J.L. 4901927 N.J. LEXIS 212
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, TRENCHARD, MINTURN, BLACK, KATZENBACH, LLOYD, VAN BUSKIRK, McGLENNON, KAYS, HETFIELD, DEAR, JJ. 11.
For reversal — None.