Jackson v. Geiger

Jan 31, 1927
Reporters:
, ,
Before:
Chancellor, Trenchard, Minturn, Black, Katzenbach, Lloyd, Van Buskirk, McGlennon, Kays, Hetfield, Dear

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, TRENCHARD, MINTURN, BLACK, KATZENBACH, LLOYD, VAN BUSKIRK, McGLENNON, KAYS, HETFIELD, DEAR, JJ. 11.

For reversal — None.