History
  • No items yet
midpage
Jackson v. Dickman
258 A.D. 912
N.Y. App. Div.
1939
Check Treatment

Action to recover for personal injuries sustained by plaintiffs when defendant Lotero’s car struck motorcycle on which plaintiffs were riding. Judgment reversed on the facts and a new trial granted, with costs to appellants to abide the event. Plaintiffs proved facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action, but the verdict of the jury is against the weight of the evidence. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty and Close, JJ., concur; Johnston and Taylor, JJ., concur as to reversal of the judgment but dissent as to granting a new trial and vote to dismiss the complaints on the ground that there was no causal relation between any negligent act on the part of Fox, the driver of the truck, and the striking of the motorcycle by defendant Lotero’s ear.

Case Details

Case Name: Jackson v. Dickman
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Dec 19, 1939
Citation: 258 A.D. 912
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.