| N.Y. Sup. Ct. | May 15, 1808

Per Curiam.

This is a clear case.. There is an uneequivocal acknowledgment by the defendant, that he went into possession under Murray &? Mumford, two of the lessors of the plaintiff; and whether he held under them or. not was a matter of fact for the jury to decide. The motion for a new trial must be denied.

Rule refused.

© 2024 Midpage AI does not provide legal advice. By using midpage, you consent to our Terms and Conditions.