Jackson ex dem. Sagoharie v. Dobbin
3 Johns. 223 | N.Y. Sup. Ct. | 1808
This is a clear case.. There is an uneequivocal acknowledgment by the defendant, that he went into possession under Murray &? Mumford, two of the lessors of the plaintiff; and whether he held under them or. not was a matter of fact for the jury to decide. The motion for a new trial must be denied.
Rule refused.
