History
  • No items yet
midpage
Jackson ex dem. Hall v. Burr
9 Johns. 104
N.Y. Sup. Ct.
1812
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

There is no devise of the real estate to the defendant. There is nothing which denotes such an intent. The defendant had his specific legacy in money, with the rest of the children. He. is not distinguished from the other heirs, in any other respect than that he is made executor. The most that could be deduced from the will is, that the executors had power to sell the land, and if that were so, the land in the mean time, and until the sale, would descend to the heirs at law. There must be judgment for the plaintiff.

Judgment for the plaintiff.

Case Details

Case Name: Jackson ex dem. Hall v. Burr
Court Name: New York Supreme Court
Date Published: May 15, 1812
Citation: 9 Johns. 104
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. Sup. Ct.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.