History
  • No items yet
midpage
Jack H. Meyer v. State
12-17-00079-CR
| Tex. App. | Apr 12, 2017
|
Check Treatment
Case Information

*1 NOS. 12-17-00077-CR 12-17-00078-CR 12-17-00079-CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS JACK H. MEYER, § APPEAL FROM THE APPELLANT § COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 1

APPELLEE § ANGELINA COUNTY, TEXAS MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM Jack H. Meyer, acting pro se, attempts to appeal his convictions for speeding in trial court cause number 16-1629, operating a motor vehicle without a license in trial court cause number 16-1630, and operating an unregistered motor vehicle in trial court cause number 16-1631, for which he received a fine of $95 in each case. Article 4.03 of the code of criminal procedure determines our jurisdiction in this matter. It provides as follows:

The Courts of Appeals shall have appellate jurisdiction coextensive with the limits of their respective districts in all criminal cases except those in which the death penalty has been assessed. This Article shall not be so construed as to embrace any case which has been appealed from any inferior court to the county court, the county criminal court, or county court at law, in which the fine imposed or affirmed by the county court, the county criminal court or county court at law does not exceed one hundred dollars, unless the sole issue is the constitutionality of the statute or ordinance on which the conviction is based.

T EX . C ODE C RIM . P ROC . A NN . art. 4.03 (West 2005). Appellant appealed to the county court at law from a lower court. The county court at law imposed a fine that does not exceed one hundred dollars. Appellant does not complain that the statutes on which his convictions were *2 based are unconstitutional. Accordingly, pursuant to Article 4.03, we lack jurisdiction over Appellant’s appeals and we dismiss the appeals for want of jurisdiction .

Opinion delivered April 12, 2017.

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J., and Neeley, J.

(DO NOT PUBLISH) 2 *3 Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J. and Neeley, J.

*4 Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J. and Neeley, J.

*5 Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J. and Neeley, J.

Case Details

Case Name: Jack H. Meyer v. State
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Texas
Date Published: Apr 12, 2017
Docket Number: 12-17-00079-CR
Court Abbreviation: Tex. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.