J.R. v. State, 739 So. 2d 743

J.R. v. State

739 So. 2d 743

Fla. Dist. Ct. App.

1999

Check Treatment

PER CURIAM.

We affirm. The record contains sufficient evidence to satisfy the requirements of Faison v. State, 426 So.2d 963 (Fla.1983). We likewise hold that appellant has failed to demonstrate reversible error in the other points raised on appeal. However, we must remand to correct the disposition order to reflect that appellant did not enter a guilty plea, but was sentenced after an adjudicatory hearing.

AFFIRMED and REMANDED with directions.

DELL, STONE and SHAHOOD, JJ., concur.