History
  • No items yet
midpage
170 A.3d 981
Pa.
2017

*1 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT JOBE DANGANAN, ON BEHALF OF : No. 44 WM 2017 HIMSELF AND ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY :

SITUATED :

: : v. :

: : GUARDIAN PROTECTION SERVICES :

: : PETITION OF: UNITED STATES COURT :

OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT :

ORDER PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 8th day of August, 2017, the Petition for Certification of Question of State Law is GRANTED . This Court shall consider the following issues:

1. Whether a non-Pennsylvania resident may bring suit under the Pennsylvania Unfair Trade Practices and Consumer Protection Law (UTPCPL), [73 P.S. §§201-1 to 201-9.3], against a business headquartered in and operating from Pennsylvania, based on transactions which occurred outside of Pennsylvania?

2. If the UTPCPL does not allow a non-Pennsylvania resident to invoke its protections, whether the parties can, through a choice-of- law provision, expand its protections to parties to the contract who are non-Pennsylvania resident consumers?

The Prothonotary is DIRECTED to establish a briefing schedule and list this case for oral argument.

Case Details

Case Name: J. Danganan v. Guardian, Pet of: U.S. Ct. of App.
Court Name: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Date Published: Aug 8, 2017
Citations: 170 A.3d 981; J. Danganan v. Guardian, Pet of: U.S. Ct. of App. - No. 44 WM 2017 (Granted)
Docket Number: J. Danganan v. Guardian, Pet of: U.S. Ct. of App. - No. 44 WM 2017 (Granted)
Court Abbreviation: Pa.
AI-generated responses must be verified
and are not legal advice.
Log In
    J. Danganan v. Guardian, Pet of: U.S. Ct. of App., 170 A.3d 981