73 So. 10 | Ala. | 1916
This appeal is upon the record only; the motion to establish the bill of exceptions having been previously denied.
It is next insisted that there was error in denying the petition for the removal of the cause.
The case of Stix & Co. v. Keith, 90 Ala. 121, 7 South. 423, cited by counsel for appellant, discloses a petition in all respects sufficient, as justifying a removal of the cause to the federal court, but that case involved no question of fraud, as is the case here, and therefore does not militate against the conclusion here reached.
We have here-treated the meritorious questions on this appeal, as presented by counsel for appellant in brief, and we find in the record no error calling for a reversal of the cause.
The judgment of the court below will therefore be affirmed.
Affirmed.