History
  • No items yet
midpage
Ivory v. State
101 Tex. Crim. 123
Tex. Crim. App.
1925
Check Treatment

The appellant was convicted in the District Court of Travis County of the offense of theft from the person and her punishment assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for a term of two years.

There are no objections found in the record to charge of the court and no bills of exception preserved to the introduction of any testimony.

Appellant filed an application for a continuance but there is no bill of exceptions found in the record to the court's action in overruling the same. In fact, the only bill of exception contained in the record is one complaining at the court's action in overruling defendant's motion for a new trial.

The motion for a new trial contains twelve different alleged grounds of error, no one of which was preserved by a separate bill of exception at the time the alleged error occurred. Under these conditions, we hold that there is nothing in the record which we can consider.

The facts being sufficient to support the verdict, and there being no error of record, it is our opinion that the judgment should be in all things affirmed.

Affirmed.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.

Case Details

Case Name: Ivory v. State
Court Name: Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Date Published: Jun 17, 1925
Citation: 101 Tex. Crim. 123
Docket Number: No. 9305.
Court Abbreviation: Tex. Crim. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.