In Ja Kim et al., Respondents, v Dong Hee Han, Appellant
Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York
[830 NYS2d 345]
Ordered that the order entered March 9, 2006 is reversed, on the law, the motion pursuant to
Ordered that the appeal from the order entered October 17, 2006 is dismissеd, as no appeal lies from an order denying a motion, in effect, for leave to reargue; and it is further,
Ordered that one bill of costs is awarded to the defendant.
The Supremе Court erred in denying the defendant‘s motion pursuant to
The plaintiffs’ remaining contentions are without merit.
Crane, J.P., Goldstein, Lifson and Carni, JJ., concur.
Lynne Iser et al., Appellants, v Robert M. Kerrigan et al., Respondents
Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York
[830 NYS2d 343]
Ordered that the orders are affirmed, with one bill of costs.
In January 2005 the plaintiffs commenced this action to recover damages for legal malpractice, alleging that the defendants’ negligence in the drafting of a will resulted in significant, avoidable estate taxes. The will was executed on June 25, 2001. The defendants separately moved to dismiss the complaint, inter alia, as time-barred, and the Supreme Court granted thosе branches of the motions pursuant to
An action to recover damages arising from an attorney‘s alleged malpractice must be commenced within three years from accrual (see McCoy v Feinman, 99 NY2d 295 [2002];
Dmitry Kovalenko, Appellant, v General Electric Capital Auto Lease, Inc., et al., Respondents
Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York
[831 NYS2d 438]
Ordered that the order and judgment is reversed, on the law, with one bill of costs, the motions for summary judgment dismissing the complaint are denied, and the complaint is reinstated.
The defendants failed to make prima facie showings that the plаintiff did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of
Furthermore, in support of their respective motions, the defendants submitted reports prepared by, among others, the plaintiff‘s treating osteopath, indicating that the plaintiff
