History
  • No items yet
midpage
Isaacs v. Isaacs
34 Del. 406
Del. Super. Ct.
1930
Check Treatment
Harrington, J.,

delivering the opinion of the court:

The words omitted from the appeal bond would not affect the rights of the appellee under such bond if judgment should be rendered against the appellant; and we, therefore, think that the bond in question sufficiently complies with the statute.

This conclusion is not inconsistent with the cases cited by the plaintiff below, and his motion to dismiss the appeal is, therefore, refused.

Case Details

Case Name: Isaacs v. Isaacs
Court Name: Superior Court of Delaware
Date Published: Jul 7, 1930
Citation: 34 Del. 406
Docket Number: No. 40
Court Abbreviation: Del. Super. Ct.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.