160 Pa. 82 | Pa. | 1894
The controlling question in this case is whether Margaret A. Irwin, one of the administrators, was a competent witness to testify to the alleged agreement between herself and her husband, since deceased, whereby she became the owner of the two horses which, as she alleges, she afterwards gave to her sons, who, in their own right, claimed them against the estate and obtained possession of them.
The facts upon which the question arose are clearly and concisely stated in the opinion of the learned judge of the orphans’ court; and his disposition of the question itself is so satisfac
Decree affirmed, on the opinion of the court below, with costs to be paid by appellants.