Irrutia v. TerreroIrrutia v. Terrero
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendant Corona Car Service Corp. appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (LeVine, J.), dated August 2, 1994, as denied its cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and all cross claims insofar as they are asserted against it.
Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, with costs, the cross motion of the defendant Co
There are no material questions of fact with respect to the plaintiffs’ claim that driver Julio Terrero was an employee of Corona Car Service Corporation (hereinafter Corona Car). Although drivers interested in receiving dispatches from Corona Car agreed to certain basic standards of conduct and rules of operation, these rules and standards related to largely incidental matters and constituted the exercise by Corona Car of only general supervisory powers (cf., Lazo v Mak’s Trading Co.,