57 Conn. App. 369 | Conn. App. Ct. | 2000
Opinion
These consolidated appeals are taken by the plaintiffs, Inversiones Lituanes, S.A., and Inamco (Camin Stock Company), S.A., from judgments rendered in favor of the defendant, E.P. Company, following a consolidated trial to the court. The plaintiffs claim that the court improperly concluded that (1) a third set of promissory notes replaced and canceled two sets of prior promissory notes that were the basis of the plaintiffs’ causes of action and (2) determined that the third set of promissory notes constituted a novation. We affirm the judgments of the trial court.
The bases of the plaintiffs’ appeals are predicated on fact bound issues, including the credibility of witnesses.
The judgments are affirmed.
The court found, among other things, that there was no consideration for either of the first two sets of promissory notes.