217 P.2d 1038 | Ariz. | 1950
On motion for a rehearing counsel call the court’s attention to an error in the calculations of sums paid the plaintiff, and further that the last paragraph of the original opinion is subject to more than one interpretation.
For the purpose of clarity the original opinion is modified by striking that certain paragraph which reads as follows: “The inter-office communication, plaintiff’s Exhibit ‘A’, stated that the commission was to be retroactive to May 1, 1945. From May
Section 61-321, A.C.A.1939, applies to the plaintiff, and the company may not pay him more than $5000 in any year. The judgment is reversed, the case remanded for trial to ascertain how much the plaintiff has earned, if any, in the way of commissions during the period of his employment, to wit: from February 12, 1945 to February 12, 1946 and from February 12, 1946 to October 1, 1946, for which he has not been paid subject to the limitations imposed by section 61-321, supra; the judgment is affirmed in all other respects. Each party shall bear his own costs upon this appeal.
Reversed and remanded for further proceedings as indicated herein.