475 So. 2d 287 | Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | 1985
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI
Two actions, one against a city alleging injuries resulting from the negligent maintenance of a sidewalk, and the other by the same plaintiff against a doctor and hospital alleging injuries resulting from negligent treatment of the injuries received as a result of the city’s negligence, were consolidated for purposes of discovery. The city filed a third party claim against the doctor and hospital (health care providers) for equitable subrogation which the health care providers moved to strike. The trial court struck the third party claim. The city petitions this court for a writ of certiorari alleging that in the interest of judicial economy the third party claim should be allowed.
In this case the city as initial tortfeasor may be held liable for the negligent acts of the subsequent tortfeasors as the city's negligence would be viewed as the proximate cause of the damages flowing from the subsequent negligent acts of the health care providers. See Stuart v. Hertz Corp., 351 So.2d 703 (Fla.1977). The main question is whether the city’s action against the subsequent tortfeasors is appropriate as a third party claim, or whether the city should file a separate action after judgment against it has been rendered.
Although the traditional rules of subro-gation support the view that the right to subrogation does not exist until an entire obligation has been discharged, this court recognized that the supreme court opinion
Here the plaintiff has chosen to sue both the alleged initial tortfeasor and the alleged subsequent tortfeasors. The two cases have thus far been consolidated only for discovery. Although the plaintiff may be entitled to a judgment against the city for all damages resulting from both injuries, the plaintiff is entitled to a judgment against the health care providers only for damages resulting from their negligence, if it is possible to apportion the damages resulting from the alleged subsequent injuries.
PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORA-RI DENIED.
. See Underwriters at Lloyds v. City of Lauderdale Lakes, 382 So.2d 702 (Fla.1980).
. See Pohl v. Witcher, 477 So.2d 1015 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985).