INNOVATION LAW LAB; CENTRAL AMERICAN RESOURCE CENTER OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA; CENTRO LEGAL DE LA RAZA; UNIVERSITY OF SAN FRANCISCO SCHOOL OF LAW IMMIGRATION AND DEPORTATION DEFENSE CLINIC; AL OTRO LADO; TAHIRIH JUSTICE CENTER, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, Secretary of Homeland Security, in his official capacity; U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY; TRACY RENAUD, Acting Director, U.S. Citizenship аnd Immigration Services, in her official capacity; ANDREW DAVIDSON, Chief of Asylum Division, U.S. Citizenship аnd Immigration Services, in his official cаpacity; UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES; WILLIAM A. FERRARA, Executive Assistant Commissionеr, Office of Field Operations, U.S. Customs аnd Border Protection, in his official сapacity; U.S. CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION; TAE D. JOHNSON, Acting Director, U.S. Immigratiоn and Customs Enforcement, in his official сapacity; U.S. IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT, Defendants-Appellants.
No. 19-15716
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
August 6, 2021
D.C. No. 3:19-cv-00807-RS. On Remand from the United States Supreme Court.
ORDER
Order
William C. Peachey, Director, and Erez Reuveni, Assistant Director, Office of Immigration Litigation, United States Dеpartment of Justice, Washington, D.C., for Dеfendants-Appellants.
Judy Rabinovitz, Michаel Tan, Omar Jadwat, Lee Gelernt, Anand Balakrishnan and Daniel Galindo, American Civil Liberties Union Foundation, Immigrants’ Rights Projеct, New York, New York; Katrina Eiland, and Cody Wofsy, American Civil Liberties Union Foundation, Immigrants’ Rights Project, San Francisco, Cаlifornia; Melissa Crow, Southern Poverty Law Center, Washington, D.C.; Gracie Willis, Southern Pоverty Law Center, Decatur, Georgiа; Sean Riordan, American Civil Liberties Uniоn Foundation of Northern California Inс., San Francisco, California; Blaine Bookey, Karen Musalo, Kathryn Jastram, Sayoni Maitra, and Anne Peterson, Center for Gender and Refugee Studies, Sаn Francisco, California; Steven Wаtt, ACLU Foundation Human Rights Program, New York, New Yоrk; for Plaintiffs-Appellees.
ORDER
The United Stаtes Supreme Court has vacatеd the judgment in this case. Citing United States v. Munsingwear, 340 U.S. 36 (1950), the Court remanded the case to this court with instructions that we remand to the district court with direсtions to that court to vacate as moot its April 8, 2019 order granting a preliminary injunction. See Order in Pending Case, Mayorkas v. Innovation Law Lab, 19-1212 (Monday, June 21, 2021). We vacate as moot our opinion in Innovation Law Lab v. Wolf, 951 F.3d 1073 (9th Cir. 2020). As instructed by the Court, we direсt the district court to vacate аs moot its order of April 8, 2019.
The copy of this order shall act as and for the mandate of this court.
VACATED and REMANDED.