History
  • No items yet
midpage
577 U.S. 1202
SCOTUS
2016

I see no sound reason to shy away from this First Amendment case. It raises an important constitutional question on which there is an acknowledged and well-developed division among the Courts of Appeals. One of this Court's most basic functions is to resolve this kind of question. I respectfully dissent from the denial of certiorari.

APPENDIX

Case Details

Case Name: Initiative v. King Cnty.
Court Name: Supreme Court of the United States
Date Published: Mar 7, 2016
Citations: 577 U.S. 1202; 136 S. Ct. 1022; 194 L. Ed. 2d 376; 84 U.S.L.W. 3498; 2016 U.S. LEXIS 1842; 44 Media L. Rep. (BNA) 2416; No. 15–584.
Docket Number: No. 15–584.
Court Abbreviation: SCOTUS
AI-generated responses must be verified
and are not legal advice.
Log In
    Initiative v. King Cnty., 577 U.S. 1202