Ingram v. South Carolina, No. 00-7406; No. 00-7543; No. 00-7674; No. 00-7711; No. 00-7851; No. 00-7863; No. 00-7901; No. 00-7909; No. 00-7914; No. 00-7940; No. 00-8033; No. 00-8078; No. 00-8085; No. 00-8218; No. 00-8221; No. 00-8295; No. 00-8351; No. 00-8538; No. 00-8599

Read

Notebook

No. 00-7406; No. 00-7543; No. 00-7674; No. 00-7711; No. 00-7851; No. 00-7863; No. 00-7901; No. 00-7909; No. 00-7914; No. 00-7940; No. 00-8033; No. 00-8078; No. 00-8085; No. 00-8218; No. 00-8221; No. 00-8295; No. 00-8351; No. 00-8538; No. 00-8599 | SCOTUS | Apr 30, 2001

*1014531 U.S. 1162" court="SCOTUS" date_filed="2001-02-20" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/graham-v-missouri-9255343?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="9255343">531 U.S. 1162;

531 U.S. 1168" court="SCOTUS" date_filed="2001-02-20" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/smith-v-moody-9255431?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="9255431">531 U.S. 1168;

531 U.S. 1172" court="SCOTUS" date_filed="2001-02-20" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/perry-v-united-states-9255481?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="9255481">531 U.S. 1172;

ante, p. 908;

ante, p. 926;

ante, p. 944;

ante, p. 910;

ante, p. 927;

*1015No. 00-7940. No. 00-8033. No. 00-8078. No. 00-8085. No. 00-8218. No. 00-8221. No. 00-8295. No. 00-8351. No. 00-8538. No. 00-8599.

531 U.S. 1198" court="SCOTUS" date_filed="2001-02-26" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/alves-v-united-services-automobile-assn-9255795?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="9255795">531 U.S. 1198;

ante, p. 944;

ante, p. 932;

531 U.S. 1182" court="SCOTUS" date_filed="2001-02-20" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/keith-v-united-states-9255627?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="9255627">531 U.S. 1182;

ante, p. 948;

ante, p. 940;

531 U.S. 1142" court="SCOTUS" date_filed="2001-02-20" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/perry-v-united-parcel-service-9255071?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="9255071">531 U.S. 1142;

ante, p. 934;

ante, p. 950; and

ante, p. 937.

Petitions for rehearing denied.