History
  • No items yet
midpage
Ingram Enterprises v. Langston
611 So. 2d 115
| Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | 1993
|
Check Treatment
PER CURIAM.

Appellants seek a remand in this workers’ compensation appeal, showing that a transcript of the merits hearing cannot be prepared and the parties are unable to provide a satisfactory substitute for the transcript. In these circumstances, we find we must reverse and remand the order on appeal for a hearing de novo. See Arnold Lumber Co. v. Harris, 469 So.2d 786 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984).

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

BOOTH, SMITH and WOLF, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Ingram Enterprises v. Langston
Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Date Published: Jan 21, 1993
Citation: 611 So. 2d 115
Docket Number: No. 92-2079
Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.