History
  • No items yet
midpage
Inglot v. Columbia Aircraft Products, Inc.
166 F.2d 433
3rd Cir.
1948
Check Treatment
PER CURIAM.

The petitioner, an honorably discharged veteran, sought in the district court an award of compensation from the respondent for loss of wages from January 7, 1946, to May 27, 1946, under Section 8(e) of the Selective Training and Service Act of 1940, 50 U.S.C.A.Appendix, § 308(e). He asserted that he had applied for his former position with the respondent but had been denied reinstatement to that or an equivalent position. We may accept the petitioner’s assertion that on or about January 7, 1946 he applied to the respondent for reinstatement in his former job of tool maker. The district court, however, found that this particular job was not available either then or thereafter during the period in' question and that the respondent offered the petitioner another job of like seniority, status and pay which he was not willing to accept. These findings are supported by the evidence and they in turn support the *434court’s conclusion that the petitioner is not entitled to the award of compensation he seeks.

The judgment of the district court will be affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Inglot v. Columbia Aircraft Products, Inc.
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Date Published: Feb 26, 1948
Citation: 166 F.2d 433
Docket Number: No. 9368
Court Abbreviation: 3rd Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.