24 Ind. 62 | Ind. | 1865
Suit by McKernan against the Railway Company and Salmon A. Buell, to compel the transfer of stock.
The complaint avers,' that on, &c., the defendant, Buell, was indebted to one James B. Brake in the sum of ten thousand dollars, and being so indebted he delivered, without assignment, to Brake, as collateral security, certificates for four hundred and seven shares of the capital stock of the Indiana and Illinois Central Railway Company, of which Buell was then the holder and owner. That afterward, the debt still remaining unpaid, Brake, having possession of the certificates of stock, on, &c., transferred his interest.in the stock to the plaintiff’, for value received. That the principal debt being still due and unpaid, the plaintiff*, on the 14th of Becember, 1863, by publication in the Indiana State Sentinel, gave public notice that he would sell the stock at public sale on the 7th of January, 1864, between the hours of ten o’clock A. M. and 4 o’clock P. M., at the office of McKernan and Pierce, No. 39 "West Washington street, in the city of Indianapolis, A copy of the notice is made a part of the complaint. That afterward, on the 7th of January, 1864, at the time and place mentioned in said notice,
That the auctioneer made a wi’itten memorandum thereof. That afterward, on, &e., the plaintiff made a demand upon the railroad company for the transfer of the stock to him on the books of the company, which was refused, &c.
There was publication as to Buell, and he made default.
The railroad company demurred to the complaint on .the ground, 1st, That the complaint does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. 2d, That there is a defect of parties, in this, that Drake is not made a party-defendant.
The demurrer was overruled, and the company excepted.
The appellant answered: 1st. Ey the general denial. 2d. That the defendant is a railroad corporation, incorporated under the general law; that under the provisions of the act entitled, “An act to provide for the incorporation of railroad companies, approved May 11, 1852,” the duly elected and qualified board of directors of the corporation made a by-law, in the words and figures following, to-wit: “ The stock of the company shall be transferable, in person or by attorney, upon the books of the company.” That the certificates of stock in question contained the following clause: “ This stock is transferable only on the books of the company, in person or by attorney, and surrender of this certificate.” That this by-law is, and has been for more than eight years, in full force. * * * *
That the demand for the transfer was made on the president and secretary of the company, who had no power to change the by-law, but were bound to obey it; that the transfer was not demanded by Buell in person, or by attorney, but by McKernan, as charged in the complaint, claiming under Drakes who is unknown, to the defendant as the
3d. That Brake and Buell have never had notice to redeem the stock pledged, as pretended in the complaint, nor - has: either of them ever had personal notice of the pretended, sale.
The plaintiff demurred to the second and third paragraphs of the answer. The court sustained the demurrers, and the appellant excepted.
Trial by the court; finding for the plaintiff; motion for a now trial overruled, and the appellant -excepted. The evidence is in the record. The notice on which the stock was-sold -is as follows:
‘NOTICE — RAILWAY STOCK EOR SALE.’
“Notice is hereby given to all whom it may concern, that" on the 28th day of November, 1855, Salmon A. Buell, being-the owner of 407 shares of the capital stock of the Indiana- and Illinois Central Railway Company, said stock being in. §50 shares, and holding as evidence of his title, certificates-of said company, viz: No. 1730 for 227 shares, and No. 1731 for 180 shares, and being indebted to James P. Brake in the sum of §10,000, did, on the day aforesaid, deliver said certificates and stock, without assignment, to said Brake, in pledge as security for the payment of said debt-, and that on the 1st day of Becember, 1862, said Brake, by delivery, for divers good considerations, transferred his interest, in said pledged certificates and stock to the undersigned. And the principal debt being now due, and- wholly unpaid, I will, on Thursday, the 7th day of January, 1864, between the hours of 10 o’clock A. M. and 4 o’clock P. M. of said day, at the office of McKernan and Pierce, No. 39 West Washington street, in the city of Indianapolis, offer said 407' shares of said stock for sale, at public auction, for the payment of the said debt of Buell to Brake.
“(Signed,) J. 3EL McKernan.”'
It is contended by the counsel for the appellee, that the railroad company cannot dispute McKernan’s title to the stock, Buell having suffered a default, on constructive notice of the pendency of the suit.
The statute provides that “the statements of a complaint .against a defendant constructively summoned, and who has :not appeared, except such as are for his benefit, shall not be taken as true, but shall be established by proof,” 2 G.& H., § 392, p. 224. And such. defendant, except in eases of divorce, may, at any time within five years after the rendition of the judgment, have the same opened, and be allowed to defend. 2 G. & H., § 43, p. 66. We think, in such case, the railroad company has a right to insist on the plaintiff making out at least a prima facie right to the legal title of the stock in question.
The complaint avers an absolute transfer from Drake to McKernan of the interest of the former in the stock, but <the proof shows, that Drake only pledged the stock to McKernan for the repayment of the $3,000 advanced by the latter to the former. Under the facts in the case, Drake was a necessary party; he had an interest in'the subject ■-matter of the litigation, and was a necessary party for comiplete ¡relief. The railroad company had a right to insist on ,his .béing made a party for the protection of its rights.
The statute provides that “ when any action is brought ’by the assignee of a claim arising out of contract, and not .assigned by indorsement in writing, the assignor shall be made a defendant, to answer as to the assignment, or his .interest in the subject of the action.” 2 G. & H., § 6, pp. 38, 39, 40. This applies as well to Drake, the intermediate, as to Buell, the original assignor, under the facts of the case, Drake still having an “ interest in the subject of the action.”
McKernan could only acquire the legal title to the stock by a sale authorized by law..
In the case of Evans v. Darlington, 5 Blackf. 320, Sullivan, J., in delivering the opinion of this court, says: “ When property has been pledged, as in the case before us, the pawnee has two remedies, either of which he may select. He may file a bill in chancery and have a judicial sale under a decree of foreclosure, or he may sell without judicial process, on the refusal of the debtor to redeem, after reasonable notice to do so. In this case, the pawnee pursued neither of the remedies given him by the law. The sale, therefore, was without authority and consequently void.”
Where the stock or bonds of a corporation are pledged, they may, upon default, be sold for the debt. But such sale must be at public auction, and can only be made upon demand of payment, and notice to the pledgor of the time and place of sale. Brown v. Ward, 3 Duer 660. The rule in this respect is the same, whether the pledge was made to secure a debt payable presently, or one payable at a future day. Stearns v. Marsh, 4 Denio 227; Wilson v. Little, 2 Comstock 443.
If the pledgor cannot be found, go as to have a personal demand made of him, the pledgee must resort to his bill. Stearns v. Marsh, supra.
There are several other questions made by the counsel of the appellant, but as McKernan acquired no title to the stock by his sale, the other questions become immaterial.
The judgment is reversed, at the cost of the appellee, and the cause remanded to said court, with directions to sustain the demurrer to the complaint, and for further proceedings in accordance with this opinion.
