Inabinett v. StateInabinett v. State
Versions:594 So. 2d 2141992 WL 27897
WRIT DENIED.
HORNSBY, C.J., and ALMON, SHORES, ADAMS and INGRAM, JJ., concur.
MADDOX, HOUSTON and STEAGALL, JJ., dissent.
MADDOX, Justice (dissenting).
I would issue the writ to review the State‘s claim that the totality of the circumstances justified the seizure in this case.
After a review, I might agree with the opinion of the Court of Criminal Appeals, 594 So.2d 202 (1992), but I cannot agree to deny certiorari review.
HOUSTON and STEAGALL, JJ., concur.