*1 500
HENDERSON, Justice, (specially concur- ring). of the DISCIPLINE OF In the Matter BRENDE, in expressed my special For those reasons an
Arlie J. as in 366 Strange, concurrence Matter Attorney at Law. of (S.D.1985),I 495, specially N.W.2d 497-98 No. 14639. concur herein. Supreme Court of South Dakota. Justice, (dissenting). MORGAN, 12, Argued Dec. 1984. the reasons stated for all I dissent herein 17, April 1985. Decided # 14637 in Matter my in dissent of Strange. Discipli- Zieser, Atty. for the R. James Ass’n, Tyndall, for com- Bd.,
nary Bar S.D.
plainant. Rasmussen, Moore, Sa- Rasmussen
Laird Falls, respondent. Kading, for Sioux
bers & HEINZMAN, Robert E. Plaintiff FOSHEIM, Chief Justice. Appellant, and (Board) Board of the Disciplinary The v. investigated the Dakota Bar of South
State Mary and John Freeman Jean HOWARD Attorney Arlie J. Falls conduct of Sioux Wife, Howard, Husband and and the to the Brende was admitted Brende. Mr. Alcester, Corporation, A State Bank of 14, August The practice on 1973. of law Appellees. Defendants and possessed that Mr. Brende Board found No. 14702. during less than ten times and used cocaine 1981, of Dakota Supreme in violation South of year the Court South Dakota. the Code and Canon I of criminal statutes 8, on Briefs March 1985. Considered Findings of The Board entered of Ethics. 17, April 1985. Decided discipli- that formal recommended Fact and in accord- be instituted nary proceedings ch. 16-19. SDCL
ance with as in were followed procedures
The same (S.D.1985), N.W.2d 366 Strange
Matter of ap- was (S.D.1985). The same Referee
495 the refer- of The recommendation
pointed. in Matter that submitted ee followed of adopt recom- these We supra.
Strange, for Mr. Brende. also
mendations
WOLLMAN, J., WUEST, and Circuit Supreme Justice,
Judge, as a ¡Acting Court
concur.
HENDERSON, J., specially concurs. J.,
MORGAN, dissents.