82 N.Y. 288 | NY | 1880
The petitioner was assessed for the regulating and grading of Seventy-sixth street, for two lots situated on said street, between First avenue and avenue A. A space *290
marked on the map annexed to the assessment as avenue B, to the depth of one hundred feet, crossing said street at right angles, was omitted from being assessed upon the assessment roll. It is claimed that this space had been closed as a public street, stricken from the map, and was subject to assessment, and that the omission to assess the same rendered the entire assessment illegal and void. The principle that all property within the limits of the territory to be assessed shall be assessed, and that the omission of a part vitiates the whole assessment, is well established. (Hassan v. City of Rochester,
The assessment for the improvement in question was made previous to January, 1876, and it being shown by the secretary of the board of assessments that the space in question was not designated on the tax map of the city, which was before the board, as property; that the property was not designated by ward, block and number; and it appearing that there was no lawful valuation when the board of assessors acted, they had *291 no power to make the valuation of such space or to assess the same. Nor do we think that the assessors were under any legal obligation to suspend their proceedings until the new assessment-roll became operative.
Independent of the consideration suggested, it is a sufficient answer to the application of the petitioner, that it does not appear from the record before us that he was assessed for paving the street along avenue B, or the cost thereof entered into the assessment actually made.
The order appealed from should be affirmed.
All concur.
Order affirmed.