History
  • No items yet
midpage
in the Interest of T.S.P., a Child
04-14-00547-CV
Tex. App.
Sep 28, 2015
Check Treatment
Case Information

*0 FILED IN 4th COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 09/28/2015 9:03:46 AM KEITH E. HOTTLE Clerk *1 ACCEPTED 04-14-00547-CV FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 9/28/2015 9:03:46 AM KEITH HOTTLE CLERK NO. 04-14-00547-CV ______________________________________________________ IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOURTH SUPREME JUDICIAL DISTRICT SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS ______________________________________________________ IN THE INTEREST OF T.S.P., A CHILD ______________________________________________________ APPELLANT’S FIRST MOTION TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING ______________________________________________________ TO THE HONORABLE JUSTICES OF THE COURT OF APPEALS:

Comes now TAD DANA PERRY, Appellant, and files this Motion to Extend

Deadline to File Motion for Rehearing before the Panel, and would show the Honorable

Court as follows:

1. A motion for rehearing may be filed within 15 days from the date a judgment or

order has been rendered by the Court. Rule 49.1 Tex. Rules App. Proc.

2. The Court may extend the deadline to file a motion for rehearing if the motion is

filed within 15 days from the deadline to file the motion. Rule 49.8 Tex. Rules

App. Proc.

The Court rendered its judgment on August 26, 2015. Appellant’s deadline to file a motion for rehearing was September 10, 2015. The time allowed for the Court to extend the deadline to file a motion will expire on September 26, 2015. *2 Appellant seeks to extend the deadline to file a motion for rehearing for 30 days, to

October 25, 2015. Appellant did not previously have access to the necessary finances sufficient to

cover costs to move for rehearing on issues not addressed in opinion, specifically

the Appellee’s failure of proof on conditions precedent related to medical support. If remanded without further clarification of the issues related to the “determination

of the amount of child support arrearages and medical support arrearages to which

[Appellee] is entitled,” the order to remand will relay to the trial court that this

Court has concluded that Appellee is in fact entitled to the increases in medical

support despite the fact that Appellee failed to prove at trial that she complied with

the Court Ordered conditions precedent to the said increases. On remand, the trial

court’s determination is not a mere question of arrearage “recalculation”. On the

contrary, the trial court implicitly found that the Appellee had in fact complied

with the conditions precedent to said increase in order for the Attorney General’s

payment record to be accurate. The Appellant’s grounds for relief included the

specific ground that the Appellee failed to introduce any evidence or her obliged

performance of the conditions precedent as required by the Decree of Divorce.

Without further clarification of the remand order, or the additional grant of relief

on that specific ground, the Appellant would be back before this Court on another

“abuse of discretion” claim on that specific issue after the trial court simply

“calculates” the amounts due upon introduction of the Attorney General’s payment

record. Appellee should not have the opportunity to make an additional attempt at

providing sufficient proof of an increase in payment amount or arrearages related

to medical support.

9. The undersigned attorney has been preparing for and appearing in numerous

administrative hearings and appearance, pre-trial, and trial settings in Texas district

and county courts over the last 30 days. This is the first request for extension to file a motion for rehearing submitted by

the Appellant in this matter. This extension of time is not sought for delay or any other dilatory purpose, but so

that the Appellant can fully research the issues of this case and clearly state the

points to be relied on for rehearing. The Appellant respectfully prays that the Court grant the instant Motion and

extend the deadline for filing of the Appellant’s Motion for Rehearing before the

Panel to October 25, 2015.

Respectfully submitted, ROBERT BARRERA P.C. 424 East Nueva San Antonio, Texas 78205 Telephone: (210) 244-5811 Facsimile: (210) 224-5890 _______/S/___________________ ROBERT J. BARRERA State Bar No. 01807500 A TTORNEY FOR A PPELLANT TAD DANA PERRY *4 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE The undersigned hereby certifies that on the 25th day of September, 2015 a true

and correct copy of the foregoing was served on all parties in this case by fax, email, or

mail.

/S/ ROBERT J. BARRERA

Case Details

Case Name: in the Interest of T.S.P., a Child
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Texas
Date Published: Sep 28, 2015
Docket Number: 04-14-00547-CV
Court Abbreviation: Tex. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.