History
  • No items yet
midpage
in the Interest of J.A.G. and J.A.G., Children
13-15-00358-CV
| Tex. App. | Sep 17, 2015
|
Check Treatment
Case Information

*1 NUMBER 13-15-00358-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG IN THE INTEREST OF J.A.G. AND J.A.G, MINORS

On appeal from the County Court at Law No. Two

of Hidalgo County, Texas.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Rodriguez, Garza, and Longoria

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam Appellant, Jose Eleuterio Garza, attempted to perfect an appeal from an order granting a motion to reconsider and granting a motion for new trial. On August 6, 2015, the Clerk of this Court notified appellant that it appeared that the order that he was

attempting to appeal did not appear to be an appealable order, and requested correction of this defect, if it could be done. The Clerk further advised appellant that the appeal would be dismissed for want of jurisdiction if the defect was not corrected within ten days *2 from the date of re ceipt of the Court’s notice. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 42.3(a),(c). Appellant did not respond to this Court’s notice.

When a motion for new trial is timely filed and the motion is granted during the trial court's plenary power, the order granting a new trial is generally not reviewable on appeal, either by direct appeal from the order or from a final judgment rendered after further proceedings in the trial court. Cummins v. Paisan Constr. Co ., 682 S.W.2d 235, 236 (Tex. 1984); Wilkins v. Methodist Health Care Sys ., 160 S.W.3d 559, 563 (Tex. 2005); see also In re Columbia Med. Ctr. of Las Colinas, Subsidiary, L.P. , 290 S.W.3d 204, 209 (Tex. 2009) (orig. proceeding). Specifically, an order granting a new trial deprives an appellate court of jurisdiction over an appeal. Yan v. Jiang , 241 S.W.3d 930 (Tex. App. — Dallas 2008, no pet.) (per curiam); see also Shrewsbury v. Por , No. 08-13-00364-CV, 2015 WL 3898801, at *1 (Tex. App. — El Paso June 24, 2015, no. pet.) (mem.op.); In re M.H.E ., No. 05-15-00226-CV, 2015 WL 3823609, at *1 (Tex. App. — Dallas June 19, 2015, no. pet.) (mem. op.).

Accordingly, the appeal is hereby DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION.

See T EX . R. A PP . P. 42.3(a).

PER CURIAM Delivered and filed this the

17th day of September, 2015.

2

Case Details

Case Name: in the Interest of J.A.G. and J.A.G., Children
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Texas
Date Published: Sep 17, 2015
Docket Number: 13-15-00358-CV
Court Abbreviation: Tex. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.