In the Interest of A.H.

574 So. 2d 1229 | Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | 1991

PER CURIAM.

We affirm as to all points raised by the appellant; however, we remand to the lower court with directions to reconcile the inconsistency between the written restitution order and the oral pronouncement of restitution. A.R. v. State, 475 So.2d 308 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985).

DOWNEY, STONE and POLEN, JJ., concur.