257 S.C. 184 | S.C. | 1971
This disciplinary proceeding is before us on a rule requiring the respondent, John Howard Wrighten, to show cause why a report of the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline, finding him guilty of misconduct as an attorney, should not be confirmed and an appropriate disciplinary order issued. The complaint specified a number of instances during the period 1964-1969 in which respondent withheld, failed to account for or misappropriated funds belonging to clients. By his answer the respondent denied these charges. Lengthy hearings were conducted before a panel of the Board on October 20, 1969, and November 24, 1969. The panel unanimously determined that respondent had been guilty of flagrant and repeated misconduct in failing to remit or account for funds due to his clients and recommended disbarment.
Pending his appearance before the full Board, respondent submitted his resignation as a member of the Bar. He did not controvert the findings of the panel before the Board,