History
  • No items yet
midpage
In re Wittekind
256 A.D. 918
N.Y. App. Div.
1939
Check Treatment

Order entered on or about December 31, 1938, affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present — O’Malley, Townley, Dore, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.; Callahan, J., dissents and votes to reverse and deny the motion for an order directing the muniei*919pal civil service commission for the city of New York to revoke the resolution adopted by it at its meeting on September 8, 1938, on the ground that the action taken was within the power and discretion of the defendants-appellants.— Order entered February 9, 1939, affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements to the petitioners-respondents against the intervenors-appellants. No opinion. Present — O’Malley, Townley, Dore, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.; Callahan, J., dissents and votes to reverse and grant the motion of the intervenors-defendants to amend their answers. [See 170 Mise. 939.]

Case Details

Case Name: In re Wittekind
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Feb 24, 1939
Citation: 256 A.D. 918
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.