History
  • No items yet
midpage
In re Warner
144 F. 987
D. Conn.
1906
Check Treatment
PLATT, District Judge.

In this matter the equities attaching to all creditors are equal, except in this, that the attaching creditoi may *989be entitled to a little greater consideration for his diligence in following his debt. If nothing prevented, the ride that, when the exact hour at which two events occurred can be known, the court will use such knowledge in the interest of justice, would appeal to the conscience of the court. It happens, however, that section 31 of the act under which we are proceeding (Act July 1, 1898, c. 541, 30 Stat. 554 [U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 3434]) stands in the way, and states explicitly the rule which must be followed, and when we apply that rule to the case in hand, and exclude the day of adjudication as we reckon backwards toward the date of attachment, we find that the attachment came within the four months and was dissolved by the adjudication.

The decision of the referee is affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: In re Warner
Court Name: District Court, D. Connecticut
Date Published: Apr 17, 1906
Citation: 144 F. 987
Docket Number: No. 1,495
Court Abbreviation: D. Conn.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.