History
  • No items yet
midpage
In re Walkerly's Estate
37 P. 893
Cal.
1894
Check Treatment
BEATTY, C. J.

These are motions to dismiss two appeals—one from a decree or order settling the accounts of the executors supplemental to their final account and distributing the estate, which was made and entered November 27, 1893; the other an attempted appeal from an order settling the final account of the executors, which was made and entered in August, 1892. The motion to dismiss the first-mentioned appeal is based upon the alleged failure of the appellants to file a printed transcript of the record in time, and is overruled because it appears that an application to settle a bill of exceptions -to the said order is pending: See Walkerly v. Greene (No. 15,712, just decided), 104 Cal. 208, 37 Pac. 890. The other motion to dismiss is also overruled, but solely on the ground that there is no such appeal, the notice having been given long after the time to appeal had expired.

We concur: Van Fleet, J.; McFarland, J.; De Haven, J.; Fitzgerald, J.

Case Details

Case Name: In re Walkerly's Estate
Court Name: California Supreme Court
Date Published: Sep 25, 1894
Citation: 37 P. 893
Docket Number: No. 15,794
Court Abbreviation: Cal.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.