History
  • No items yet
midpage
In re Wager
6 Paige Ch. 11
New York Court of Chancery
1836
Check Treatment
The Chancellor

decided that it was the duty of the sheriff, in such cases, to select and summon such jurors as he thought proper, and who were indifferent in relation to the matter; that the commissioners were only authorized to decide upon the validity of challenges to jurors so selected; and that it was irregular and improper for them to dictate to the sheriff what jurors should be summoned in the first instance. For this irregularity, the proceedings were ordered to be set aside ; and a new commission was directed to be issued.

Case Details

Case Name: In re Wager
Court Name: New York Court of Chancery
Date Published: Feb 1, 1836
Citation: 6 Paige Ch. 11
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.