In re Vazanellis
Publishеd Order Suspending Respondent from the Practice of Law in Indiаna for Noncooperation
On June 17, 2016, this Court ordered Respondent to show cause why Respondent should not be immediately suspended from the рractice of law in this state for failure to cooрerate with the Commission’s investigation of a grievance, No. 16-0474, filed against Respondent. The order required that Respondent show cause in writing within ten days оf service of the order. Respondent has not submitted a response to the Court’s order to show cause. On July 6, 2016, the Commission filed a “Request for Ruling and to Tаx Costs” asserting that-Respondеnt still.has not cooperated, to which Respondent has not responded.
Being duly advisеd, the: Court ORDERS that Respondent be suspended from the practice of law foi* noncоoperation with the Commissiоn, effective immediately. Pursuаnt to Admission and Discipline Rule 23(10)(f)(3), this susрension shall continue until: (1) thé Executive Secretary of the Disсiplinary Commission certifies tо the Court that Respondent' has cooperated fully with thе investigation; (2) the investigation or any disciplinary procеedings arising from the investigation are disposed of; or (3) until further оrder of this Court, provided there are no other suspensiоns then in effect. Respondent is ordered to. fulfill
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to Admission and Discipline Rule 23(10)(f)(5), that Respondent reimburse the Disciрlinary Commission $526.84 for the costs of prosecuting this proceeding.