History
  • No items yet
midpage
In Re UPS Supply Chain Solutions, Inc., Fair Labor Standards Act (Flsa) Litigation
2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 79678
J.P.M.L.
2010
Check Treatment
Docket

ORDER DENYING TRANSFER

JOHN G. HEYBURN II, Chairman.

Before the entire Panel: Defendant, UPS Supply Chain Solutions, Inc., has moved, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407, for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings of this litigation in the Southern District of Florida or, alternatively, the Northern District of Georgia. Plaintiffs in the Southern District of Florida action do not object to centralization in the Southern District of Florida. Plaintiffs in the District of Oregon action agree that centralization is appropriate, but suggest centralization in the District of Oregon or, alternatively, the Northern District of California.

This litigation currently consists of two actions pending in two districts, one action each in the Southern District of Florida and the District of Oregon. Given that only two actions are pending against one common defendant, the proponents of centralization have failed to convince us that any common questions of fact between these actions are sufficiently complex and/or numerous to justify Section 1407 transfer at this time. Alternatives to transfer exist that may minimize whatever possibilities there are of duplicative discovery and/or inconsistent pretrial rulings. See, e.g., In re Eli Lilly and Company (Cephalexin Monohydrate) Patent Litigation, 446 F.Supp. 242, 244 (Jud.Pan.Mult.Lit.1978); see also Manual for Complex Litigation, Fourth, § 20.14 (2004).

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the motion, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407, for centralization of these actions is denied.

Case Details

Case Name: In Re UPS Supply Chain Solutions, Inc., Fair Labor Standards Act (Flsa) Litigation
Court Name: United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation
Date Published: Aug 6, 2010
Citation: 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 79678
Docket Number: MDL 2175
Court Abbreviation: J.P.M.L.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Log In