| Mich. | Jan 5, 1875

The Court

held that the question sought to be raised would necessarily involve a review of the order of the recorder’s court, by virtue of which the prisoner is confined, and that habeas corpus is not the proper remedy; and that the question must be raised by writ of error or other appropriate remedy.

Writ denied.

© 2024 Midpage AI does not provide legal advice. By using midpage, you consent to our Terms and Conditions.