In re Trust Created Under the Last Will & Testament of Statler
It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs.
Memorandum: With respect to the order in appeal No. 1, we conclude that the Surrogate did not err in exercising her discretion under
“[i]n case of the . . . resignation ... of any Trustee hereunder, the Surrogate . . . may from time to time designate and appoint a successor Trustee or Trustees so that there shall at all times be at least three trustees qualified and acting hereunder.”
We further conclude that, even absent an application for appointment of a successor trustee, the Surrogate has the authority under the Indenture to appoint one or more trustees to replace a single resignor and thereby maintain the total number of trustees at more than three. The Surrogate’s exercise of that authority did not “contravene the express terms of the” Indenture (
We conclude with respect to the order in appeal No. 2 that, in view of the factors set forth in Matter of Greatsinger (67 NY2d 177, 183-184 [1986]), the Surrogate did not abuse her discretion in denying the request of petitioner, a trustee, seeking reimbursement from the trust for the amount of counsel fees incurred in opposing the Surrogate’s appointment of a successor trustee (see id. at 181; see generally
PIGOTT, JR., P.J.
SCUDDER, KEHOE, SMITH and PINE, JJ.