History
  • No items yet
midpage
In Re Trotter
20 S.E. 386
N.C.
1894
Check Treatment
Pee Curiam :

We have examined the authorities cited by counsel with much care, and after due consideration we conclude that his Honor erred in sustaining the action of the Clerk in refusing to accept the bond of Trotter upon the ground stated by him. It is not found that the said Trotter has been in default in any particular, except a failure to renew his bond, and this he offers to do in response to the notice served upon him. Reversed.

Case Details

Case Name: In Re Trotter
Court Name: Supreme Court of North Carolina
Date Published: Sep 5, 1894
Citation: 20 S.E. 386
Court Abbreviation: N.C.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Log In